There’s a new movement receiving a great deal of attention lately. The Sunday Assemblies have been growing and spreading in England in the United States, promising a congregational experience without God and touting the admirable motto, “Live better, help often, wonder more.”
I hadn’t paid them much attention, although what I’d heard had made me wonder whether they knew about Unitarian Universalism or Religious Humanism – and whether we might be a fit for these people. Then I heard an interview with the two founders, who made it very clear that they welcome people who believe in God as well as people who don’t, and that some of their leaders are in fact Christians. “Aha,” I thought, “they really are like Unitarian Universalists.”
And then the whole thing took a huge turn.
“We really don’t mention God, or Atheism, or anything like that. We make it as welcoming as possible for all people. We don’t talk about faith, because that ends up alienating people, but we also don’t talk about not believing in it,” said Sanderson Jones, the group’s co-founder. Asked what they sing, the other co-founder, Pippa Evans, answered, “The songs that as you wake up in the morning, you’d be happily singing along to….” And the examples they gave were utterly content free – the lyrics didn’t seem to matter.
That’s when it hit me that there is a significant difference between Unitarian Universalism and the Sunday Assemblies. The movement they presented is based on a model of never challenging anyone. The guiding principal seems to be that no one who comes should ever be made to feel uncomfortable – and to me that just isn’t enough. Authentic community is sometimes uncomfortable, and people need to be able to deal with hard questions of meaning. We don’t have to believe in God – I don’t, at least not by conventional definitions – but we should be able to be challenged, from time to time, in our assumptions.
That seems to be the fundamental difference between the Sunday Assemblies and Unitarian Universalism. Unitarian Universalists embrace diversity, talk about the many things we believe, sometimes challenging each others’ assumptions just by doing that, because we recognize that being with people who see things differently than we do helps us grow and deepen as human beings. In the Sunday Assemblies – at least based on the interview – diversity of viewpoints is something that might exist but isn’t talked about, assumptions go unchallenged, and everything is kept very, very safe.
Ironically, this is what Unitarian Universalists are often falsely accused of being.
I hope I’m wrong about this, because I would celebrate the emergence of a powerful, culturally relevant new Humanist movement. They certainly are doing good work in the world, and they are as yet very young. But I need a community that will help me make meaning through the tough times of life, that will challenge me to think as well as feel, and that will help me grow as a person. That’s why I’m a Unitarian Universalist.
The Song and the Sigh 
I prefer Unitarian Universalism too, for that sense of challenge. But I can understand that some people might really need a place where faith isn’t discussed, just doing good and being part of a caring community. Perhaps they experienced spiritual abuse, or just didn’t like the coercion or manipulation of their “home” faith, and so ANY talk of faith is threatening. (There might be UUs who feel that way too.) I’m always glad for any religious movement that inspires people and encourages life-affirming beliefs. It’s not a threat to UU. In fact, it’s the opposite. If this movement actually becomes very popular, surely the two groups will start to see how much they have in common, and there will be opportunities to share and grow.
One of the conversations I’ve been having elsewhere brought out the point that the Sunday Assemblies are very young as a movement. There’s every possibility – and I hold out hope – that they will deepen over time. It will require getting past the “we never talk about anything that might make someone uncomfortable” stage, though. The world has a great deal to gain if they do.
[…] The Rev. Dan Schatz has figured out a key difference between the Sunday Assemblies and Unitarian Universalism. […]
I am late discovering this post, but I am glad that I have, because it offers an analysis of the Sunday Assembly movement that I had not considered. I, too, have been watching them closely, and trying to figure out where the diversion was from UUism. I am among those UU’s who is not entirely comfortable with terms like “faith” and “ministry” and even “religion”, and “God”, and so the SA idea was looking very appealing to me… I just couldn’t put my finger on what was missing. I think you’ve hit the nail on the head, though: I enjoy being a part of a compassionate community which, among its other functions, inspires me to question my ideas and explore my spirituality. I don’t know quite what Sunday Assembly would have to offer me, other than not having to deal with those traditionally “religious” words that I dislike so much.
Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book on it or something. I think that you could do with a few pics to drive the message home a bit, but other than that, this is an excellent blog. A great read. I’ll definitely be back.
I am checking-out The Sunday Asswmbly. UU is deeper? Maybe TSA works for non-elitists – whom I’ve heard in UU and non-UUs, to be fair.
TSA also doesn’t seem like a group who denigrates a deist, or a deist who refuses to watch either MSNBC (or Fox for that matter.)
Thanks.
Ron
I’ve also seen elistists and non-elistists in UUism, but I’ve also seen both just about everywhere else. Part of what I love so much about the UU congregation I service (The BuxMont Unitarian Universalist Fellowship in Warrington, Pennsylvania) is that we have an honest diversity of theologies and spiritualities – Christians, Humanists, Theists, Atheists, Pagans, Buddhists and far more – and everyone talks to each other, respects the differences, and learns from them.